# Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni vs Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro

As of Nov 4, 2026, the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni costs $800 and the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro costs $750, so the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro is $50 cheaper. The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni scores higher in our ranking (7.9 vs 6.6 out of 10). Pick the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni for hard floor homes that want top mopping. Pick the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro for hard floor homes on a midrange budget.

Prices checked Nov 4, 2026. HTML version: https://robotsforthat.com/vs/ecovacs-deebot-x9-pro-omni-vs-roborock-qrevo-2-pro/

## Side by side

| | Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni | Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $800 | $750 |
| 3 year cost | $1,100 | $750 |
| Our score | 7.9/10 | 6.6/10 |
| Rank in Floors | #13 | #32 |
| Status | on sale | on sale |
| Warranty | 1 year (MacRumors) | 1 year (Roborock US store) |
| Suction | 16,600 Pa and 16.3 L/s airflow (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars measured 2.76 kPa and 27 CFM, the highest airflow it had recorded at the time | 20,000 Pa (Roborock store page); Tom's Guide listed 25,000 Pa in its review specs |
| Navigation | dToF laser with TruEdge 3D edge sensor (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars measured 0.93 m2 per minute, above the 0.70 average, but BGR saw mapping errors that took about 20 minutes to fix | PreciSense LiDAR on top of the robot (Roborock); Tom's Guide mapped four rooms in about 10 minutes |
| Obstacle avoidance | RGBD camera with structured light, AIVI 3D 3.0 (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars scored 19 of 24 against a 17 average | Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Gizmodo saw it swallow micro USB cables and a sock, TechRadar saw it avoid a shoe and sock but snag a USB cable |
| Mopping | OZMO Roller 175 mm roller mop, 3,700 Pa pressure, up to 220 rpm, extends to edges, 10 mm lift (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars scored 158 of 184 on dried stains against a 93 average | Dual spinning mops with FlexiArm edge reach, auto mop removal for carpet, 0.591 in mop lift (Roborock); Tom's Guide saw soy sauce, mayonnaise and mud cleared in two passes |
| Self empty | Yes, 3 L dust bag in the dock (Ecovacs) | Yes, self sealing dust bag, up to 65 days (Roborock); Tom's Guide lists a 2.7 L dock bag |
| Dock features | Auto empty, hot water mop wash (40 to 75 C), 63 C hot air drying, auto detergent, 4 L clean and 2.2 L dirty tanks, station self cleaning (Ecovacs) | Mop wash up to 149°F, 113°F warm air drying, 4 L clean water refill, removable base (Roborock); Tom's Guide cited 167°F wash |
| Runtime | Up to 252 min silent vacuum, 158 min vacuum and mop (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars measured 200 min at low power and about 876 sq ft per charge, below the 1,015 sq ft average | Tom's Guide lists 253 min and a 6,400 mAh battery; Gizmodo cleaned 750 sq ft in just under two hours with a little over 50% left |
| Dustbin | 220 ml robot bin (Ecovacs; Vacuum Wars notes the 388 ml average) | 11.8 fl oz robot bin (Tom's Guide) |
| Height | 98 mm, 3.86 in (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars measured 3.80 in; MacRumors says 3.85 in | 3.80 in (Roborock) |
| Pet hair | Vacuum Wars measured 93% flattened pet hair pickup and 0% hair wrap on its 7 in hair test | Tom's Guide measured 60% of hair picked up on hardwood and 48% on carpet |
| App | Ecovacs Home app with YIKO voice assistant; Matter support (MacRumors needed iOS 18.4 or later for Apple Home) | Roborock app with SmartPlan 3.0; works with Alexa, Siri, Google Home and Matter (Roborock); TechRadar found custom room names unreliable by voice |
| Threshold | 20 mm (Ecovacs; Vacuum Wars calls this average) | Not listed by Roborock; TechRadar says it handles regular doorways but not high thresholds |
| Noise | 64.5 dBA vacuuming, 79.2 dBA while emptying (Ecovacs); MacRumors found vacuuming too loud for night use | TechRadar measured about 60 dB on carpet and 69 dB peak during dock emptying; Roborock lists 45 dB drying noise |
| Best for | hard floor homes that want top mopping | hard floor homes on a midrange budget |
| Skip if | you have many fringed or thin rugs | you have cluttered floors or lots of carpet hair |

## What reviewers found

### Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni

- Vacuum Wars: Measured 2.76 kPa suction and 27 CFM airflow, 93% pet hair pickup, 0% hair wrap, 158 of 184 on dried stains and 89% carpet deep clean. Coverage was 876 sq ft per charge against a 1,015 sq ft average. [Source](https://vacuumwars.com/ecovacs-deebot-x9-pro-omni-review/)
- MacRumors: Three months of testing. Long hair did not tangle the brush, mopping and navigation beat the X8 Pro Omni, and Siri control through Matter worked. Thin rugs caused frequent tangles and vacuuming was loud. About 1,000 sq ft per charge. [Source](https://www.macrumors.com/review/ecovacs-x9-pro-omni-robot-vacuum/)
- BGR (9/10): Called the roller mop the best robot mop available and vacuuming very good. Mapping was error prone and needed about 20 minutes of fixes, and tanks are no longer see through. [Source](https://bgr.com/reviews/ecovacs-deebot-x9-pro-omni-review-the-best-you-can-get-for-now/)

### Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro

- Tom's Guide: Picked up 92.5% of cereal and 60% of hair on hardwood, but only 76.5% of cereal, 51% of flaxseed and 48% of hair on carpet. Mopping cleared soy sauce, mayonnaise and mud in two passes. It bumped furniture with some force. [Source](https://www.tomsguide.com/home/roborock-qrevo-2-pro-review)
- TechRadar: About 60 dB on carpet and 69 dB peak when emptying. Mopping was excellent on max settings, it avoided a shoe and sock but got caught on a USB cable. Subscores: Value 5/5, Design 4/5, Performance 4.5/5, App 5/5. [Source](https://www.techradar.com/home/robot-vacuums/roborock-qrevo-2-pro-review)
- Gizmodo (3.5/5): Cleaned a 750 sq ft apartment in just under two hours with over 50% battery left. It swept up micro USB cables and a child's sock, and the test unit needed a fix for a loose part under the brush. [Source](https://gizmodo.com/roborock-qrevo-2-pro-a-midrange-robovac-that-will-eat-your-cables-2000802293)

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is better, the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni or the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro?

The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni scores higher in our ranking (7.9 vs 6.6 out of 10). Pick the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni for hard floor homes that want top mopping. Pick the Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro for hard floor homes on a midrange budget.

### Which is cheaper?

The Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro at $750, versus $800 for the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni, checked Nov 4, 2026. Over 3 years with running costs: $1,100 vs $750.

### What is the difference between the Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the Qrevo 2 Pro?

Suction: 16,600 Pa and 16.3 L/s airflow (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars measured 2.76 kPa and 27 CFM, the… on the Deebot X9 Pro Omni, 20,000 Pa (Roborock store page); Tom's Guide listed 25,000 Pa in its review specs on the Qrevo 2 Pro. Navigation: dToF laser with TruEdge 3D edge sensor (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars measured 0.93 m2 per… on the Deebot X9 Pro Omni, PreciSense LiDAR on top of the robot (Roborock); Tom's Guide mapped four rooms in about… on the Qrevo 2 Pro. Obstacle avoidance: RGBD camera with structured light, AIVI 3D 3.0 (Ecovacs); Vacuum Wars scored 19 of 24… on the Deebot X9 Pro Omni, Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Gizmodo saw it swallow micro USB… on the Qrevo 2 Pro.

Full reviews: [Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/ecovacs-deebot-x9-pro-omni/index.md), [Roborock Qrevo 2 Pro](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/roborock-qrevo-2-pro/index.md)