# Eureka E10s vs Roborock Qrevo S Pro

As of Nov 4, 2026, the Eureka E10s costs $400 and the Roborock Qrevo S Pro costs $400. The Eureka E10s has a published review score and ranks #48 in our robot vacuums ranking; the Roborock Qrevo S Pro is not scored yet. Pick the Eureka E10s for routine daily vacuuming without buying bags. Pick the Roborock Qrevo S Pro for hard floors that need regular mopping.

Prices checked Nov 4, 2026. HTML version: https://robotsforthat.com/vs/eureka-e10s-vs-roborock-qrevo-s-pro/

## Side by side

| | Eureka E10s | Roborock Qrevo S Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $400 | $400 |
| 3 year cost | $400 | $477 |
| Our score | 5.2/10 | Not scored yet |
| Rank in Floors | #48 | #56 |
| Status | on sale | on sale |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year (Roborock US store) |
| Suction | 4,000 Pa with 4 levels and automatic carpet boost (Eureka) | 18,500 Pa (Roborock) |
| Navigation | Spinning LiDAR with real time mapping and up to 3 floor maps (Vacuum Wars) | PreciSense LiDAR (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 0.86 m² per minute against a 0.71 average |
| Obstacle avoidance | No object recognition; Eureka's own comparison table marks obstacle avoidance as not supported | Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Vacuum Wars saw it avoid only 5 of 24 obstacles against a 16 average |
| Mopping | Yes, mop pad with a 200 ml tank (AppleInsider) that lifts 10 mm when ultrasonic sensing detects carpet | Dual spinning mops up to 200 rpm, 30 water levels, 10 mm lift (Roborock); Vacuum Wars combined mopping score 39.4 against a 31.1 average |
| Self empty | Yes, bagless station with a see through bin, up to 45 days of debris (Eureka) | Yes, up to 65 days without manual emptying (Roborock) |
| Dock features | Bagless auto empty and charging only; no mop washing or drying | Mop wash up to 167°F, 113°F warm air drying, auto refill; 4 L clean and 4 L dirty tanks (T3) |
| Runtime | Up to 180 min on the lowest power (Eureka); TechRadar got just over an hour at max suction | Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,495 sq ft per charge and up to 240 min; 5,200 mAh battery (Roborock) |
| Dustbin | Eureka lists a 2 L dust container; the station holds up to 45 days of debris | 330 ml (Vacuum Wars) |
| Height | 3.9 in (robot 13.8 x 13.8 x 3.9 in, Eureka) | 3.8 in (Roborock, T3) |
| Pet hair | Vacuum Wars found its exhaust did not blow hair around; Eureka's table marks side brush anti tangle as not supported | Vacuum Wars measured 43% flattened pet hair pickup against an 82% average, with 62% of long hair wrapping |
| App | Eureka app with mapping, no go and no mop zones and schedules; Vacuum Wars found no mop zones failed and battery percentage is hidden | Roborock app; works with Alexa, Siri and Google Home; Matter promised by a future update (Roborock) |
| Threshold | Crosses thresholds up to 20 mm (Vacuum Wars) | n/a |
| Noise | About 55 dB on low to about 70 dB on max (TechRadar) | T3 measured 64 dB vacuuming, 52 dB mopping and 70 dB emptying; Roborock lists under 60 dB in quiet vacuum mode |
| Best for | routine daily vacuuming without buying bags | hard floors that need regular mopping |
| Skip if | your floors are often cluttered with cables and socks | you have shedding pets or cluttered floors |

## What reviewers found

### Eureka E10s

- AppleInsider: Solid daily vacuuming, especially on carpets in turbo mode, but the 200 ml tank and lack of a low water alert made mopping underwhelming; turbo runtime was about half the advertised 180 minutes. Marked as sponsored content. [Source](https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/11/15/eureka-e10s-review-an-ideal-solution-for-everyday-cleaning)
- TechRadar: Good mid range robot for daily cleaning; mapping took wrong turns at first, mopping handled fresh spills but not stains, and the self empty path sometimes clogged. Runtime at max suction was just over an hour. TechRadar gave a Performance 3.5/5 subscore but no overall rating. [Source](https://www.techradar.com/home/robot-vacuums/eureka-e10s-robot-vacuum)
- Vacuum Wars (1.87/5): Strong real world cleaning and better than average mopping for its price, but below average airflow and suction bench results, slow navigation and a buggy app where no mop zones did not work. [Source](https://vacuumwars.com/eureka-e10s-review/)

### Roborock Qrevo S Pro

- Vacuum Wars (2.70 Vacuum Wars stars): Strong mopping (39.4 vs 31.1 average) and 81% carpet deep clean, but 43% pet hair pickup, 62% long hair wrap and only 5 of 24 obstacles avoided. Estimated 1,495 sq ft per charge. [Source](https://vacuumwars.com/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-review/)
- T3: UK review measured 64 dB vacuuming, 52 dB mopping and 70 dB emptying. It switched well between carpet and hard floor, but missed some debris on textured rugs and handled large dried cereal poorly. [Source](https://www.t3.com/home-living/vacuum-cleaners/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-review-a-mid-priced-robot-vacuum-and-mop-with-a-high-end-cleaning-performance)

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is better, the Eureka E10s or the Roborock Qrevo S Pro?

The Eureka E10s has a published review score and ranks #48 in our robot vacuums ranking; the Roborock Qrevo S Pro is not scored yet. Pick the Eureka E10s for routine daily vacuuming without buying bags. Pick the Roborock Qrevo S Pro for hard floors that need regular mopping.

### What is the difference between the E10s and the Qrevo S Pro?

Suction: 4,000 Pa with 4 levels and automatic carpet boost (Eureka) on the E10s, 18,500 Pa (Roborock) on the Qrevo S Pro. Navigation: Spinning LiDAR with real time mapping and up to 3 floor maps (Vacuum Wars) on the E10s, PreciSense LiDAR (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 0.86 m² per minute against a 0.71… on the Qrevo S Pro. Obstacle avoidance: No object recognition; Eureka's own comparison table marks obstacle avoidance as not… on the E10s, Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Vacuum Wars saw it avoid only 5 of… on the Qrevo S Pro.

Full reviews: [Eureka E10s](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/eureka-e10s/index.md), [Roborock Qrevo S Pro](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/roborock-qrevo-s-pro/index.md)