# iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock vs Roborock Q7 M5+

As of Nov 4, 2026, the iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock costs $270 and the Roborock Q7 M5+ costs $250, so the Roborock Q7 M5+ is $20 cheaper. The iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock has a published review score and ranks #40 in our robot vacuums ranking; the Roborock Q7 M5+ is not scored yet. Pick the iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock for simple daily upkeep in small homes. Pick the Roborock Q7 M5+ for mixed floor homes that want auto empty on a budget.

Prices checked Nov 4, 2026. HTML version: https://robotsforthat.com/vs/irobot-roomba-105-combo-autoempty-vs-roborock-q7-m5-plus/

## Side by side

| | iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock | Roborock Q7 M5+ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $270 | $250 |
| 3 year cost | $270 | $378 |
| Our score | 6.1/10 | Not scored yet |
| Rank in Floors | #40 | #49 |
| Status | on sale | on sale |
| Warranty | n/a | 1 year (Roborock US store) |
| Suction | iRobot claims 70X the Roomba 600 series with 4 suction levels; Tek.no lists 7,000 Pa and found it lower than rivals | 10,000 Pa with five levels (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 2.24 kPa sealed suction against a 0.83 kPa average |
| Navigation | ClearView LiDAR, cleans in rows, up to 3 maps, about 10 min per 1,000 sq ft (iRobot); Tek.no saw it get stuck and take a long time | Top mounted LiDAR with multi level maps (Roborock); TechRadar found mapping accurate and reliable |
| Obstacle avoidance | LiDAR only, no camera (iRobot) | No front obstacle sensor; Roborock's Amazon comparison table marks obstacle avoidance as not included, and TechRadar saw it hit every test object |
| Mopping | Yes, microfiber pad with a micro pump, 3 water levels and SmartScrub; avoids carpet in mop modes (iRobot); Tek.no called it essentially a wet cloth | Yes, fixed pad with three water levels and no mop lift; Tom's Guide measured about 270 ml of usable tank |
| Self empty | Yes, bagged AutoEmpty dock rated for up to 75 days (iRobot) | Yes, RockDock Plus with a 2.7 L sealed bag, up to 7 weeks per bag (Roborock store) or 7 to 9 weeks (Amazon listing) |
| Dock features | Auto empty and charging only; no pad washing (iRobot) | Auto empty and charging only; no mop washing, drying or water refill |
| Runtime | Tek.no lists 120 min; iRobot lists a 3,000 mAh LFP battery but no runtime | Up to 150 min (Roborock Amazon listing); Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,060 sq ft per charge |
| Dustbin | Not published by iRobot | 400 ml robot bin (Tom's Guide) plus 2.7 L dock bag |
| Height | 4.09 in (iRobot) | 3.9 in (Tom's Guide, TechRadar) |
| App | Roomba Home app with schedules, keep out zones, suction and water settings; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only (iRobot); Tek.no found the map view weaker than rivals | Roborock app with schedules, room settings, no go and no mop zones and live map; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only; works with Alexa and Google Home |
| Weight | 6.45 lb robot (iRobot) | n/a |
| Pet hair | n/a | Vacuum Wars measured 79% flattened pet hair pickup against an 81% average, with 43% of long hair wrapping the brush |
| Threshold | n/a | Climbs 2 cm thresholds (Roborock store) |
| Noise | n/a | Tom's Guide measured about 53 to 72 dB depending on floor and power |
| Best for | simple daily upkeep in small homes | mixed floor homes that want auto empty on a budget |
| Skip if | you want real scrubbing or obstacle recognition | your floors are often covered in cables, socks or toys |

## What reviewers found

### iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock

- Tek.no (Norway): Rated it mediocre. Vacuums well and LiDAR improved navigation over older Roombas, but it got stuck, took a long time, has lower suction than rivals and a basic wet cloth mop. [Source](https://www.tek.no/produkter/41949/irobot-roomba-105-combo-autoempty)
- Just A Dad Approved (4.6/10): After about three months of home use it scored 5.5 of 10 for mopping, 6 for carpet, 5 for hair tangle and 1.5 for obstacle avoidance, running over items under about 3 inches. Only 2 of 6 marketing claims passed. The reviewer advised skipping it at full price. The page prints 4.6/10 in one place and 4.8 out of 10 in another. [Source](https://justadadapproved.com/product/irobot-roomba-105-combo-robot-vacuum-mop-autoempty/)
- Vacuum Chef: Hands on test with the AutoEmpty dock. Measured 395 FPM airflow on carpet against a 420 FPM category average, the best it has recorded for an entry level iRobot. Mapping was much faster than older non LiDAR Roombas. The mop only drags and does not lift, hair tangles on the roller and the firmware update took nearly an hour. [Source](https://vacuumchef.com/irobot-roomba-105-combo-review-7000-pa-power-smart-mapping-real-world-test-results/?amp=1)

### Roborock Q7 M5+

- Tom's Guide: Tested the Q7 M5 robot without the dock: 93.3% overall pickup on tile and 85% on carpet, with 70% of pet and human hair on carpet. Human hair caught on the brush roll and the mop only handled light dirt. [Source](https://www.tomsguide.com/home/smart-home/roborock-q7-m5-robot-vacuum-review)
- TechRadar: Called the Q7 M5 a brilliant budget bot with accurate mapping and strong pet hair pickup, but it hit every test object, long hair still wrapped the brush and the app had several glitches. Subscores: Value 4/5, Performance 4/5, App 3.5/5. [Source](https://www.techradar.com/home/robot-vacuums/roborock-q7-m5-robot-vacuum-review)
- Vacuum Wars (2.01 Vacuum Wars stars): Above average suction and navigation speed, but average results on embedded sand (75%) and flattened pet hair (79%), 43% hair wrap, and heavy water use when mopping. [Source](https://vacuumwars.com/roborock-q7-m5-and-m5-review/)

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is better, the iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock or the Roborock Q7 M5+?

The iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock has a published review score and ranks #40 in our robot vacuums ranking; the Roborock Q7 M5+ is not scored yet. Pick the iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock for simple daily upkeep in small homes. Pick the Roborock Q7 M5+ for mixed floor homes that want auto empty on a budget.

### Which is cheaper?

The Roborock Q7 M5+ at $250, versus $270 for the iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock, checked Nov 4, 2026. Over 3 years with running costs: $270 vs $378.

### What is the difference between the Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock and the Q7 M5+?

Suction: iRobot claims 70X the Roomba 600 series with 4 suction levels; Tek.no lists 7,000 Pa and… on the Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock, 10,000 Pa with five levels (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 2.24 kPa sealed suction… on the Q7 M5+. Navigation: ClearView LiDAR, cleans in rows, up to 3 maps, about 10 min per 1,000 sq ft (iRobot)… on the Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock, Top mounted LiDAR with multi level maps (Roborock); TechRadar found mapping accurate and… on the Q7 M5+. Obstacle avoidance: LiDAR only, no camera (iRobot) on the Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock, No front obstacle sensor; Roborock's Amazon comparison table marks obstacle avoidance as… on the Q7 M5+.

Full reviews: [iRobot Roomba 105 Combo + AutoEmpty Dock](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/irobot-roomba-105-combo-autoempty/index.md), [Roborock Q7 M5+](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/roborock-q7-m5-plus/index.md)