# Narwal Freo X10 Pro vs Roborock Qrevo S Pro

As of Oct 31, 2026, the Narwal Freo X10 Pro costs $500 and the Roborock Qrevo S Pro costs $500. Pick the Narwal Freo X10 Pro for tidy homes that want mop washing on a budget. Pick the Roborock Qrevo S Pro for hard floors that need regular mopping.

Prices checked Oct 31, 2026. HTML version: https://robotsforthat.com/vs/narwal-freo-x10-pro-vs-roborock-qrevo-s-pro/

## Side by side

| | Narwal Freo X10 Pro | Roborock Qrevo S Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500 | $500 |
| 3 year cost | $500 | $577 |
| Our score | Not scored yet | Not scored yet |
| Rank in Floors | #54 | #55 |
| Status | on sale | on sale |
| Warranty | n/a | 1 year (Roborock US store) |
| Suction | 11,000 Pa claimed (Narwal) | 18,500 Pa (Roborock) |
| Navigation | LiDAR (Narwal); MacStories found it handled furniture and rugs well and stores up to four maps | PreciSense LiDAR (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 0.86 m² per minute against a 0.71 average |
| Obstacle avoidance | Forward structured light, no camera (Narwal, SmartWorld); MacStories and SmartWorld both found it struggles with cables and small objects | Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Vacuum Wars saw it avoid only 5 of 24 obstacles against a 16 average |
| Mopping | Dual rotating Reuleaux triangle pads, 6 to 8 N pressure, 12 mm lift, EdgeReach extension (Narwal); SmartWorld notes wash water is not heated | Dual spinning mops up to 200 rpm, 30 water levels, 10 mm lift (Roborock); Vacuum Wars combined mopping score 39.4 against a 31.1 average |
| Self empty | Yes, 1 L disposable bag or 800 ml bin per Narwal, up to 7 weeks; SmartWorld describes a 2.5 L compacting bag in the base | Yes, up to 65 days without manual emptying (Roborock) |
| Dock features | Mop washing, 104°F warm air drying, dust compression (Narwal); no detergent dispenser (SmartWorld) | Mop wash up to 167°F, 113°F warm air drying, auto refill; 4 L clean and 4 L dirty tanks (T3) |
| Runtime | Not listed by Narwal; MacStories used about 30% battery for 500 sq ft in 70 min; SmartWorld says nearly 200 m² per charge; 5,000 mAh battery (Narwal) | Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,495 sq ft per charge and up to 240 min; 5,200 mAh battery (Roborock) |
| Dustbin | 800 ml robot bin or 1 L bag (Narwal) | 330 ml (Vacuum Wars) |
| Height | 107.7 mm (Narwal spec table) | 3.8 in (Roborock, T3) |
| Pet hair | DualFlow tangle free floating roller and detangling side brushes (Narwal); SmartWorld found it well suited to long hair and pet shedding | Vacuum Wars measured 43% flattened pet hair pickup against an 82% average, with 62% of long hair wrapping |
| App | Narwal app with multi floor maps, no go zones, schedules; Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only (Narwal) | Roborock app; works with Alexa, Siri and Google Home; Matter promised by a future update (Roborock) |
| Threshold | 2 cm (Narwal) | n/a |
| Noise | n/a | T3 measured 64 dB vacuuming, 52 dB mopping and 70 dB emptying; Roborock lists under 60 dB in quiet vacuum mode |
| Best for | tidy homes that want mop washing on a budget | hard floors that need regular mopping |
| Skip if | your floors often have cables or socks | you have shedding pets or cluttered floors |

## What reviewers found

### Narwal Freo X10 Pro

- MacStories: Over two months it vacuumed about 500 sq ft in roughly 70 minutes using about 30% battery. Mopping the same floor took close to 90 minutes. Had more trouble with cords and light bath mats than a camera based Roomba j7. Narwal provided the unit. [Source](https://www.macstories.net/reviews/two-months-with-the-narwal-freo-x10-pro/)
- SmartWorld: Good mopping for a non premium system and nearly 200 m² per charge. No front camera, so it struggles with cables and small objects. Wash water is not heated and there is no detergent dispenser. [Source](https://www.smartworld.it/recensioni/narwal-freo-x10-pro)

### Roborock Qrevo S Pro

- Vacuum Wars (2.70 Vacuum Wars stars): Strong mopping (39.4 vs 31.1 average) and 81% carpet deep clean, but 43% pet hair pickup, 62% long hair wrap and only 5 of 24 obstacles avoided. Estimated 1,495 sq ft per charge. [Source](https://vacuumwars.com/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-review/)
- T3: UK review measured 64 dB vacuuming, 52 dB mopping and 70 dB emptying. It switched well between carpet and hard floor, but missed some debris on textured rugs and handled large dried cereal poorly. [Source](https://www.t3.com/home-living/vacuum-cleaners/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-review-a-mid-priced-robot-vacuum-and-mop-with-a-high-end-cleaning-performance)

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is better, the Narwal Freo X10 Pro or the Roborock Qrevo S Pro?

Pick the Narwal Freo X10 Pro for tidy homes that want mop washing on a budget. Pick the Roborock Qrevo S Pro for hard floors that need regular mopping.

### What is the difference between the Freo X10 Pro and the Qrevo S Pro?

Suction: 11,000 Pa claimed (Narwal) on the Freo X10 Pro, 18,500 Pa (Roborock) on the Qrevo S Pro. Navigation: LiDAR (Narwal); MacStories found it handled furniture and rugs well and stores up to… on the Freo X10 Pro, PreciSense LiDAR (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 0.86 m² per minute against a 0.71… on the Qrevo S Pro. Obstacle avoidance: Forward structured light, no camera (Narwal, SmartWorld); MacStories and SmartWorld both… on the Freo X10 Pro, Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Vacuum Wars saw it avoid only 5 of… on the Qrevo S Pro.

Full reviews: [Narwal Freo X10 Pro](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/narwal-freo-x10-pro/index.md), [Roborock Qrevo S Pro](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/roborock-qrevo-s-pro/index.md)