# Narwal Freo X10 Pro vs Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

As of Oct 31, 2026, the Narwal Freo X10 Pro costs $500 and the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) costs $500. Pick the Narwal Freo X10 Pro for tidy homes that want mop washing on a budget. Pick the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) for vacuum only cleaning with no bags.

Prices checked Oct 31, 2026. HTML version: https://robotsforthat.com/vs/narwal-freo-x10-pro-vs-shark-matrix-self-empty-rv2310ae/

## Side by side

| | Narwal Freo X10 Pro | Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500 | $500 |
| 3 year cost | $500 | $500 |
| Our score | Not scored yet | Not scored yet |
| Rank in Floors | #54 | #56 |
| Status | on sale | on sale |
| Warranty | n/a | 1 year limited, 2 years on parts (SharkNinja US store) |
| Suction | 11,000 Pa claimed (Narwal) | No Pa rating from Shark; Vacuum Wars rated bench suction well above average but published no kPa figure |
| Navigation | LiDAR (Narwal); MacStories found it handled furniture and rugs well and stores up to four maps | 360 degree LiDAR with Matrix Clean grid passes (Shark); Vacuum Wars mapped about 350 sq ft in just over 5 min and found it about 28% faster than a Roomba i3+ EVO |
| Obstacle avoidance | Forward structured light, no camera (Narwal, SmartWorld); MacStories and SmartWorld both found it struggles with cables and small objects | Shark says it detects and avoids objects day or night; Vacuum Wars did not test it |
| Mopping | Dual rotating Reuleaux triangle pads, 6 to 8 N pressure, 12 mm lift, EdgeReach extension (Narwal); SmartWorld notes wash water is not heated | No |
| Self empty | Yes, 1 L disposable bag or 800 ml bin per Narwal, up to 7 weeks; SmartWorld describes a 2.5 L compacting bag in the base | Yes, bagless base that holds up to 45 days of debris (Shark) |
| Dock features | Mop washing, 104°F warm air drying, dust compression (Narwal); no detergent dispenser (SmartWorld) | Auto empty and charging only (Shark) |
| Runtime | Not listed by Narwal; MacStories used about 30% battery for 500 sq ft in 70 min; SmartWorld says nearly 200 m² per charge; 5,000 mAh battery (Narwal) | 90 min, 6 hour charge (Shark); Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,000 sq ft per charge |
| Dustbin | 800 ml robot bin or 1 L bag (Narwal) | 0.2 qt robot cup (Shark) |
| Height | 107.7 mm (Narwal spec table) | 4.2 in (Vacuum Wars spec table) |
| Pet hair | DualFlow tangle free floating roller and detangling side brushes (Narwal); SmartWorld found it well suited to long hair and pet shedding | Self cleaning anti hair wrap brushroll (Shark); Vacuum Wars said it did not notice a big difference from anti wrap rolls on robots |
| App | Narwal app with multi floor maps, no go zones, schedules; Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant; 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only (Narwal) | SharkClean app with map editing, zones and schedules; works with Alexa and Google Assistant (Vacuum Wars) |
| Threshold | 2 cm (Narwal) | n/a |
| Best for | tidy homes that want mop washing on a budget | vacuum only cleaning with no bags |
| Skip if | your floors often have cables or socks | you want mopping or a newer model |

## What reviewers found

### Narwal Freo X10 Pro

- MacStories: Over two months it vacuumed about 500 sq ft in roughly 70 minutes using about 30% battery. Mopping the same floor took close to 90 minutes. Had more trouble with cords and light bath mats than a camera based Roomba j7. Narwal provided the unit. [Source](https://www.macstories.net/reviews/two-months-with-the-narwal-freo-x10-pro/)
- SmartWorld: Good mopping for a non premium system and nearly 200 m² per charge. No front camera, so it struggles with cables and small objects. Wash water is not heated and there is no detergent dispenser. [Source](https://www.smartworld.it/recensioni/narwal-freo-x10-pro)

### Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

- Vacuum Wars: Called it Shark's best performing robot vacuum at the time. Covered about 1,000 sq ft per charge versus about 820 for a Roomba i3+ EVO, mapped about 350 sq ft in just over 5 min, and beat the Roomba on crevice pickup and carpet deep cleaning. Battery efficiency 1.29 min per 1%. [Source](https://www.vacuumwars.com/shark-matrix-review)
- 9to5Toys: Tested the Shark Matrix with the bagless 45 day self empty base at a $499.99 MSRP (the review does not print a model number). LiDAR avoided objects taller than a few inches, stopping about an inch away, but did not detect cords. It was barely audible on normal mode and Matrix mode added about 5 min in the largest room. The app does not show live robot position. [Source](https://9to5toys.com/2023/04/20/shark-matrix-robot-vacuum-review/)

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is better, the Narwal Freo X10 Pro or the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)?

Pick the Narwal Freo X10 Pro for tidy homes that want mop washing on a budget. Pick the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) for vacuum only cleaning with no bags.

### What is the difference between the Freo X10 Pro and the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)?

Suction: 11,000 Pa claimed (Narwal) on the Freo X10 Pro, No Pa rating from Shark; Vacuum Wars rated bench suction well above average but… on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE). Navigation: LiDAR (Narwal); MacStories found it handled furniture and rugs well and stores up to… on the Freo X10 Pro, 360 degree LiDAR with Matrix Clean grid passes (Shark); Vacuum Wars mapped about 350 sq… on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE). Obstacle avoidance: Forward structured light, no camera (Narwal, SmartWorld); MacStories and SmartWorld both… on the Freo X10 Pro, Shark says it detects and avoids objects day or night; Vacuum Wars did not test it on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE).

Full reviews: [Narwal Freo X10 Pro](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/narwal-freo-x10-pro/index.md), [Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/shark-matrix-self-empty-rv2310ae/index.md)