# Roborock Qrevo S Pro vs Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

As of Oct 31, 2026, the Roborock Qrevo S Pro costs $500 and the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) costs $500. Pick the Roborock Qrevo S Pro for hard floors that need regular mopping. Pick the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) for vacuum only cleaning with no bags.

Prices checked Oct 31, 2026. HTML version: https://robotsforthat.com/vs/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-vs-shark-matrix-self-empty-rv2310ae/

## Side by side

| | Roborock Qrevo S Pro | Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $500 | $500 |
| 3 year cost | $577 | $500 |
| Our score | Not scored yet | Not scored yet |
| Rank in Floors | #55 | #56 |
| Status | on sale | on sale |
| Warranty | 1 year (Roborock US store) | 1 year limited, 2 years on parts (SharkNinja US store) |
| Suction | 18,500 Pa (Roborock) | No Pa rating from Shark; Vacuum Wars rated bench suction well above average but published no kPa figure |
| Navigation | PreciSense LiDAR (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 0.86 m² per minute against a 0.71 average | 360 degree LiDAR with Matrix Clean grid passes (Shark); Vacuum Wars mapped about 350 sq ft in just over 5 min and found it about 28% faster than a Roomba i3+ EVO |
| Obstacle avoidance | Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Vacuum Wars saw it avoid only 5 of 24 obstacles against a 16 average | Shark says it detects and avoids objects day or night; Vacuum Wars did not test it |
| Mopping | Dual spinning mops up to 200 rpm, 30 water levels, 10 mm lift (Roborock); Vacuum Wars combined mopping score 39.4 against a 31.1 average | No |
| Self empty | Yes, up to 65 days without manual emptying (Roborock) | Yes, bagless base that holds up to 45 days of debris (Shark) |
| Dock features | Mop wash up to 167°F, 113°F warm air drying, auto refill; 4 L clean and 4 L dirty tanks (T3) | Auto empty and charging only (Shark) |
| Runtime | Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,495 sq ft per charge and up to 240 min; 5,200 mAh battery (Roborock) | 90 min, 6 hour charge (Shark); Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,000 sq ft per charge |
| Dustbin | 330 ml (Vacuum Wars) | 0.2 qt robot cup (Shark) |
| Height | 3.8 in (Roborock, T3) | 4.2 in (Vacuum Wars spec table) |
| Pet hair | Vacuum Wars measured 43% flattened pet hair pickup against an 82% average, with 62% of long hair wrapping | Self cleaning anti hair wrap brushroll (Shark); Vacuum Wars said it did not notice a big difference from anti wrap rolls on robots |
| App | Roborock app; works with Alexa, Siri and Google Home; Matter promised by a future update (Roborock) | SharkClean app with map editing, zones and schedules; works with Alexa and Google Assistant (Vacuum Wars) |
| Noise | T3 measured 64 dB vacuuming, 52 dB mopping and 70 dB emptying; Roborock lists under 60 dB in quiet vacuum mode | n/a |
| Best for | hard floors that need regular mopping | vacuum only cleaning with no bags |
| Skip if | you have shedding pets or cluttered floors | you want mopping or a newer model |

## What reviewers found

### Roborock Qrevo S Pro

- Vacuum Wars (2.70 Vacuum Wars stars): Strong mopping (39.4 vs 31.1 average) and 81% carpet deep clean, but 43% pet hair pickup, 62% long hair wrap and only 5 of 24 obstacles avoided. Estimated 1,495 sq ft per charge. [Source](https://vacuumwars.com/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-review/)
- T3: UK review measured 64 dB vacuuming, 52 dB mopping and 70 dB emptying. It switched well between carpet and hard floor, but missed some debris on textured rugs and handled large dried cereal poorly. [Source](https://www.t3.com/home-living/vacuum-cleaners/roborock-qrevo-s-pro-review-a-mid-priced-robot-vacuum-and-mop-with-a-high-end-cleaning-performance)

### Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

- Vacuum Wars: Called it Shark's best performing robot vacuum at the time. Covered about 1,000 sq ft per charge versus about 820 for a Roomba i3+ EVO, mapped about 350 sq ft in just over 5 min, and beat the Roomba on crevice pickup and carpet deep cleaning. Battery efficiency 1.29 min per 1%. [Source](https://www.vacuumwars.com/shark-matrix-review)
- 9to5Toys: Tested the Shark Matrix with the bagless 45 day self empty base at a $499.99 MSRP (the review does not print a model number). LiDAR avoided objects taller than a few inches, stopping about an inch away, but did not detect cords. It was barely audible on normal mode and Matrix mode added about 5 min in the largest room. The app does not show live robot position. [Source](https://9to5toys.com/2023/04/20/shark-matrix-robot-vacuum-review/)

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is better, the Roborock Qrevo S Pro or the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)?

Pick the Roborock Qrevo S Pro for hard floors that need regular mopping. Pick the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) for vacuum only cleaning with no bags.

### What is the difference between the Qrevo S Pro and the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)?

Suction: 18,500 Pa (Roborock) on the Qrevo S Pro, No Pa rating from Shark; Vacuum Wars rated bench suction well above average but… on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE). Navigation: PreciSense LiDAR (Roborock); Vacuum Wars measured 0.86 m² per minute against a 0.71… on the Qrevo S Pro, 360 degree LiDAR with Matrix Clean grid passes (Shark); Vacuum Wars mapped about 350 sq… on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE). Obstacle avoidance: Structured light Reactive Tech, no camera (Roborock); Vacuum Wars saw it avoid only 5 of… on the Qrevo S Pro, Shark says it detects and avoids objects day or night; Vacuum Wars did not test it on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE).

Full reviews: [Roborock Qrevo S Pro](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/roborock-qrevo-s-pro/index.md), [Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)](https://robotsforthat.com/robot/shark-matrix-self-empty-rv2310ae/index.md)