Skip to content
Live

Beatbot iSkim vs Betta SE Plus

Researched by Riley Hart · prices checked Nov 4, 2026

Short answer · checked Nov 4, 2026

As of Nov 4, 2026, the Beatbot iSkim costs $339 and the Betta SE Plus costs $390, so the Beatbot iSkim is $51 cheaper. The Betta SE Plus has a published review score and ranks #3 in our robotic pool cleaners ranking; the Beatbot iSkim is not scored yet. Pick the Beatbot iSkim for uncovered pools under trees. Pick the Betta SE Plus for pools with lots of floating leaves. The Beatbot iSkim wins 3 of 3 points we can measure.

Who wins, point by point

The Beatbot iSkim wins 3 of 3 points we can measure. Built from today's prices, the specs and independent tests for these two robots.

iSkimSE PlusWinner
Price today$339$390iSkim
Charge time5 h6 hiSkim
Warranty3 years1 yeariSkim
Pick the iSkim if
  • You want to spend less (saves $51)
  • You care most about charge time (5 h vs 6 h)
  • You care most about warranty (3 years vs 1 year)
  • Best for uncovered pools under trees
Pick the SE Plus if
  • Best for pools with lots of floating leaves
Pool
BeatbotiSkim
Cleans
Water surface only
Power
Cordless
Runtime
Up to 28 h on a full
Max pool
Beatbot lists no maximum
ON SALEPrice tracked daily

Solar surface skimmer with a 9 L basket and 28 h rated runtime

Full Beatbot iSkim review, pros and cons →
Pool
BettaSE Plus
Cleans
Water surface only:
Power
Solar
Runtime
30+ hours of continuous
Max pool
Up to 40 x 60 ft
9.0/10Price tracked daily

Solar surface skimmer with plug-in backup charging and a remote

Full Betta SE Plus review, pros and cons →

Side by side

Beatbot iSkimBetta SE Plus
Price$339$390
3 year cost$339$390
Our scoreNot scored yet9.0/10
Rank in Pool#17#3
Statuson saleon sale
Warranty3 years1 year
CleansWater surface only (Beatbot); floor robot needed for the pool bottomWater surface only: leaves, bugs and floating debris (it does not clean floor or walls)
PowerCordless, 10,000 mAh lithium-ion battery plus 24 W solar panel with SolarTrack (Beatbot)Solar plus AC adapter backup (Betta); The Pool Nerd describes the backup as USB-C
RuntimeUp to 28 h on a full charge with no sun, lab figure (Beatbot); Reviewed and Android Authority repeat the 28 h claim30+ hours of continuous cleaning on a full charge (Betta); The Pool Nerd says it runs around the clock when charged
Charge timeBeatbot spec table says about 5 h with a 64.4 W adapter; its FAQ says about 4.5 h. The plug in charger is sold separately5 to 6 h in direct sun, 3.5 h with the AC adapter (Betta)
Filter9 L basket, catches debris down to 550 µm (30 mesh), 29 x 270 mm inlet (Beatbot)Large 200 micron fine mesh top load basket; capacity not published (Betta)
Max pool sizeBeatbot lists no maximum; Android Authority says it covers up to 80 sq m (about 860 sq ft) in a couple of hoursUp to 40 x 60 ft, about 2,400 sq ft (Betta)
AppBeatbot app over Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: remote drive, scheduling, recall, cleaning logs, OTA updates (Beatbot)No app; wireless remote included (Betta). Bob Vila lists the lack of app control as a con
Warranty3 years (Beatbot store page and Reviewed)1 year (Betta)
Weight15 lb (Reviewed)n/a
Pool typesIn-ground and above-ground; concrete, tile, vinyl, fiberglass; saltwater up to 5,000 ppm (Beatbot)n/a
NavigationDual ultrasonic sensors plus IMU, random path, auto edge parking (Beatbot; Android Authority notes no S-path)n/a
Motorsn/aTwin salt chlorine tolerant (SCT) motors (Betta)
Best foruncovered pools under treespools with lots of floating leaves
Skip ifyour pool stays covered most daysyou want app control or floor cleaning

Specs are maker claims unless a reviewer is named. Prices from the stores we link, checked daily.

What reviewers found

Beatbot iSkim

  • Reviewed: Five days in a windy above-ground pool flanked by trees; the tester never needed a hand skimmer and the 9 L basket never overflowed between daily checks. Downsides were the missing charger and an app remote that takes practice. Editors' Choice badge. Source
  • Android Authority: Hands-on with a Sora 30: charged itself by sun after an initial plug in of a couple of hours in a sunny desert test, and covered about 80 sq m in a couple of hours. Lacks the Ultra's S-path and clarifier. Source

Betta SE Plus

  • Bob Vila (tested) (4.6/5): Best Overall of seven skimmers tested over about two months in residential inground pools. Easy to set up and removed more leaves and floating debris than any other model. Rated ease of use 5/5, performance 4.9/5, value 4/5. The tester's earlier Betta SE stopped working after about 12 months. Source
  • The Pool Nerd: Used in the reviewer's own pool; the surface was clear of leaves, bugs and trash after a few hours, and he went weeks without skimming by hand. Rated Pool Nerd Approved. Says little changed from the SE beyond backup charging, for about $30 more. The site earns affiliate commissions. Source

Questions buyers ask

Which is better, the Beatbot iSkim or the Betta SE Plus?

The Betta SE Plus has a published review score and ranks #3 in our robotic pool cleaners ranking; the Beatbot iSkim is not scored yet. Pick the Beatbot iSkim for uncovered pools under trees. Pick the Betta SE Plus for pools with lots of floating leaves.

Which is cheaper?

The Beatbot iSkim at $339, versus $390 for the Betta SE Plus, checked Nov 4, 2026. Over 3 years with running costs: $339 vs $390.

What is the difference between the iSkim and the SE Plus?

Cleans: Water surface only (Beatbot); floor robot needed for the pool bottom on the iSkim, Water surface only: leaves, bugs and floating debris (it does not clean floor or walls) on the SE Plus. Power: Cordless, 10,000 mAh lithium-ion battery plus 24 W solar panel with SolarTrack (Beatbot) on the iSkim, Solar plus AC adapter backup (Betta); The Pool Nerd describes the backup as USB-C on the SE Plus. Runtime: Up to 28 h on a full charge with no sun, lab figure (Beatbot); Reviewed and Android… on the iSkim, 30+ hours of continuous cleaning on a full charge (Betta); The Pool Nerd says it runs… on the SE Plus.

Also consider at this price

See all ranked →

More comparisons

All robotic pool cleaners, ranked

See the ranking →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission. It never changes our score. Disclosure