iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo vs Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

Researched by Riley Hart · prices checked Oct 31, 2026

Short answer · checked Oct 31, 2026

As of Oct 31, 2026, the iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo costs $470 and the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) costs $500, so the iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo is $30 cheaper. The iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo has a published review score and ranks #37 in our robot vacuums ranking; the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) is not scored yet. Pick the iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo for small spaces with no room for a dock. Pick the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) for vacuum only cleaning with no bags.

Floors

iRobotRoomba 205 DustCompactor Combo

Suction: iRobot claims 70x
Navigation: ClearView LiDAR
Mopping: Reusable microfiber pad

5.8/10Price tracked daily

$470Check price at Search Amazon →

A space saving Roomba with no tall dock, good LiDAR navigation and a large compacting bin. TechRadar needed to empty it after 8 days rather than 60 and measured 78 dB. Mopping and obstacle handling are weak, so it suits small tidy homes.

Full iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo review →

Floors

SharkMatrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

Suction: No Pa rating from Shark
Navigation: 360 degree LiDAR
Mopping: No
Runtime: 90 min

ON SALEPrice tracked daily

$500Check price at Amazon →

A plain, vacuum only Shark with LiDAR and a bagless base that Vacuum Wars called Shark's best performing robot when it tested it. It is an older 2023 model with a short 90 minute runtime, and the $499.99 store price is high when the Matrix Plus 2 in 1 sells for less. Most buyers should pick the Matrix Plus instead unless this one is discounted.

Full Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) review →

Side by side

	iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo	Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)
Price	$470	$500
3 year cost	$470	$500
Our score	5.8/10	Not scored yet
Rank in Floors	#37	#56
Status	on sale	on sale
Warranty	n/a	1 year limited, 2 years on parts (SharkNinja US store)
Suction	iRobot claims 70x the suction of Roomba 600 series, 4 levels; no Pa figure published	No Pa rating from Shark; Vacuum Wars rated bench suction well above average but published no kPa figure
Navigation	ClearView LiDAR, up to 3 maps (iRobot)	360 degree LiDAR with Matrix Clean grid passes (Shark); Vacuum Wars mapped about 350 sq ft in just over 5 min and found it about 28% faster than a Roomba i3+ EVO
Obstacle avoidance	Basic; TechRadar saw it push toys and drag a cable, Tech Advisor saw it suck up a glove and get stuck	Shark says it detects and avoids objects day or night; Vacuum Wars did not test it
Mopping	Reusable microfiber pad with Carpet Detect to avoid rugs (iRobot); Tech Advisor found it mostly spread mess	No
Self empty	No dock emptying; compacts debris onboard, claimed up to 60 days (iRobot); TechRadar needed to empty it after 8 days	Yes, bagless base that holds up to 45 days of debris (Shark)
Dock features	Small charging base only (Tech Advisor)	Auto empty and charging only (Shark)
Runtime	Not published; iRobot says it covers up to 1,000 sq ft	90 min, 6 hour charge (Shark); Vacuum Wars estimated about 1,000 sq ft per charge
Dustbin	About 1.5 L compacting bin (TechRadar, Tech Advisor)	0.2 qt robot cup (Shark)
Height	3.98 in (robot 14.1 x 14.09 x 3.98 in, iRobot)	4.2 in (Vacuum Wars spec table)
Pet hair	No measured pet hair result published in the reviews we read	Self cleaning anti hair wrap brushroll (Shark); Vacuum Wars said it did not notice a big difference from anti wrap rolls on robots
App	Roomba Home app; works with Alexa, Siri and Google Assistant (iRobot)	SharkClean app with map editing, zones and schedules; works with Alexa and Google Assistant (Vacuum Wars)
Threshold	Not published	n/a
Noise	TechRadar measured an average of 78 dB from five feet	n/a
Best for	small spaces with no room for a dock	vacuum only cleaning with no bags
Skip if	you want real mopping or good obstacle avoidance	you want mopping or a newer model

Specs are maker claims unless a reviewer is named. Prices from the stores we link, checked daily.

What reviewers found

iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo

TechRadar (Performance 2.5/5): Measured an average of 78 dB from five feet. The roughly 1.5 L bin needed emptying after eight days. It pushed aside toys and dragged a phone cable. Called a crushing disappointment. Source
Tech Advisor: Good carpet cleaning and LiDAR navigation, but mopping mostly spread mess and it got stuck on furniture bases and thin table legs. Source

Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

Vacuum Wars: Called it Shark's best performing robot vacuum at the time. Covered about 1,000 sq ft per charge versus about 820 for a Roomba i3+ EVO, mapped about 350 sq ft in just over 5 min, and beat the Roomba on crevice pickup and carpet deep cleaning. Battery efficiency 1.29 min per 1%. Source
9to5Toys: Tested the Shark Matrix with the bagless 45 day self empty base at a $499.99 MSRP (the review does not print a model number). LiDAR avoided objects taller than a few inches, stopping about an inch away, but did not detect cords. It was barely audible on normal mode and Matrix mode added about 5 min in the largest room. The app does not show live robot position. Source

Pros and cons

iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo

Pros

Compact charging base with no dock bin
About 1.5 L compacting bin
Reliable LiDAR navigation per Tech Advisor
Good carpet cleaning per Tech Advisor
Works with Alexa, Siri and Google

Cons

Emptied after 8 days in TechRadar testing, not 60
78 dB average noise in TechRadar testing
Weak mopping
Gets stuck and pushes obstacles
Out of stock at iRobot on 2026-10-26

Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)

Pros

Bagless self empty base
Fast, efficient LiDAR mapping
Strong hard floor and carpet pickup in Vacuum Wars tests
Good crevice cleaning

Cons

No mop
90 minute runtime
Older 2023 design
Costs more than the Matrix Plus 2 in 1 on Shark's store
Obstacle avoidance not independently tested

Questions buyers ask

Which is better, the iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo or the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)?

The iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo has a published review score and ranks #37 in our robot vacuums ranking; the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) is not scored yet. Pick the iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo for small spaces with no room for a dock. Pick the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE) for vacuum only cleaning with no bags.

Which is cheaper?

The iRobot Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo at $470, versus $500 for the Shark Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE), checked Oct 31, 2026. Over 3 years with running costs: $470 vs $500.

What is the difference between the Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo and the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE)?

Suction: iRobot claims 70x the suction of Roomba 600 series, 4 levels; no Pa figure published on the Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo, No Pa rating from Shark; Vacuum Wars rated bench suction well above average but… on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE). Navigation: ClearView LiDAR, up to 3 maps (iRobot) on the Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo, 360 degree LiDAR with Matrix Clean grid passes (Shark); Vacuum Wars mapped about 350 sq… on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE). Obstacle avoidance: Basic; TechRadar saw it push toys and drag a cable, Tech Advisor saw it suck up a glove… on the Roomba 205 DustCompactor Combo, Shark says it detects and avoids objects day or night; Vacuum Wars did not test it on the Matrix Self Empty (RV2310AE).

Also consider

See all ranked →

Floors · Dreame D20 Plus $3109.5/10 Floors · TP-Link Tapo RV30 Max Plus $2509.2/10 Floors · Ecovacs Deebot N30 Pro Omni $3159.1/10 Floors · Ecovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni $4009.1/10

More comparisons

All robot vacuums, ranked

See the ranking →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission. It never changes our score. Disclosure